W,
you wrote:
It might be my imagination but I have been sensing a despondency or at least
a lack of optimism in your e-mails.
We must try to be beyond optimism and pessimism, like in the famous Romain
Rolland quote (a favourite of Gramsci's):'pessimism of the intelligence,
optimism of the will'. Ernst Bloch's Prinzip Hoffnung points in the same
direction.
And Gandhi said something like this: what we do probably completely lacks
significance, but it is very important that we do it anyway.
So let's hope that the Spinelli component is gaining strength from day to
day. Let me give you some examples: only recently, there appreared a first
scholarly biography of the man (the
one by Graglia). And, by the way, yourself and myself also illustrate the
growing importance of Spinelli : only 5 years ago, I had hardly heard about the
guy; by now I have already managed to spread the word abt his Ventotene
manifesto and 1984 draft constitution to several friends and foes, via email,
www and printed articles. And then, look at all those, young and old,
intellectuals and activists, who are soooo bitterly anti-EU. The time is
approaching when they are bound to (re)discover Spinelli...
Finally, let's not forget that Spinelli is dead and that we must try to
supersede him. He certainly had an inkling about 'the atomic age', yes, when we
compare him with the contemporary zombies of Paris, Berlin, London and
Brussels:
Contemple-les, mon âme; ils sont vraiment affreux! - Baudelaire
But Spinelli did not yet know of the nanotech, biotech and robotics based
weapons systems of the 2010s; nor did he, on the other hand, have any first
hand experience of the new superpower of the cyberlibrary, which is now offered
to us.
And then, W, you also wrote:
I have been wondering what solutions might be possible.
You commented, perhaps not without irony, that people (read: myself) would
not be ready to change their attitude. On the contrary, people (including
myslf) will not be die-hard if you manage to document your view in a convincing
manner. However, in the case of the 'chemtrails', what you have said so far
leads me to ask: would you be ready to part from the truth, if that would help
to mobilize the people for our goals?
No, lying must be condemned in politics, even when no other "solution" seems
available. Enough of Blair, Bush and Berlusconi! Long live the 911 Truth
Movement!
All the best.
- Mika
PS Do you need more grounds for hope? Here comes:
""What the election and the global embrace of Obama's brand proved
decisively is that there is a tremendous appetite for progressive change - that
many, many people do not want markets opened at gunpoint, are repelled by
torture, believe passionately in civil liberties, want corporations out of
politics, see global warming as the fight of our time, and very much want to be
part of a political project larger than themselves.
Those kinds of transformative goals are only ever achieved when independent
social movements build the numbers and the organizational power to make
muscular demands of their elites. Obama won office by capitalizing on our
profound nostalgia for those kinds of social movements. But it was only an
echo, a memory. The task ahead is to build movements that are - to borrow an
old Coke slogan - the real thing. As Studs Terkel, the great oral historian,
used to say: "Hope has never trickled down. It has always sprung up."
Quoted from
Naomi Klein's new preface to the 10th anniversary edition of her book No
Logo which has been published a week ago.